Beckett plays on the idea of confidence astoundingly here. He requests confidence from everyone and in the last scene he annihilates this confidence. He firmly conveys his message, there is no the great beyond and we are only waiting on this planet for one thing just, demise. The play in its own privilege contains numerous existentialist topics and ideas which are transferred to the gathering of people through the activities and reflections of the principle characters. The principle existentialist topic which Beckett manages is that demise is the main inevitable probability. He utilizes the relatively religious activity of waiting and turns it on its head. He does this by making them wait inevitably for someone who they have knew seen or met. Vladimir and Estragon are in actuality waiting in vain, Beckett emphatically addresses the idea of religion in “Waiting for Godot”. He utilizes certain religious images, for example, the tree, which is one of the not very many props obvious on the stage. The absence of leaves in act one mean that the characters are lost and have no course; they discuss hanging themselves, perhaps to escape from the unending waiting. The tree represents the world as nothingness, articulating Estrogens and Vladimir’s lack of meaning and place in the world. The growth of the leaves in act 2 adds to the characters anxiety about their lack of purpose but can also represent the idea of revival. This becomes clear when Vladimir states, “musingly The last moment . . . He meditates. Hope deferred maketh the something sick, who said that? (15) Vladimir is referring to the biblical proverb that goes: “Hope deferred makes the heart sick; but a desire fulfilled is a tree of life” (Proverbs 13:12). This could mean that the tree’s leaves blooming in is a symbol that they are far from their destinies that have been delayed for another time. Like when Vladimir said, “things have changed here since yesterday.” (203). Ironic due to the fact that nothing has changed from act 1 to act 2. Likewise waiting is a focal piece of the play. Waiting can be translated as a religious action. Numerous individuals of the catholic religion trust that they are on this planet waiting to go to paradise i.e. the great beyond. Beckett hits out at this idea. He does this by demonstrating that nothing occurs toward the finish of Vladimir and Estragon’s waiting. The title, waiting for Godot, is extremely astute. It can be, and has been perused as waiting for god. No doubt, on first look that Vladimir and Estragon are undoubtedly waiting for god, or a divine figure. “In any case, that isn’t the inquiry. What are we doing here, that is the issue. What’s more, we are honored in this, that we happen to know the appropriate response. Truly, in this tremendous perplexity one thing alone is clear. We are waiting for Godot to come.” (Beckett 526) We are never influenced mindful as to whom To godot really may be. Is his character shrouded in secret or, does Godot basically not exist? We the group of onlookers, alongside the focal characters, have never observed Godot. We are to just to trust in this puzzling figure. Beckett, as an existentialist author, is extremely mindful of his mortality and this echoes all through his works, particularly waiting for Godot. The title can likewise be perused as waiting to no end, as the tricky Godot does not show up. Another use of symbolism, time. Time is exiled from the physical universe of which they occupy. The watch is a consistent indication of this. He thinks that he can hear it ticking but its really a human heart. He gets paranoid by this noise. At the point when the watch is lost Pozzo is free from all nerves. He never again will undoubtedly time or never again perceives his own mortality, despite the fact that regardless it exists and is ever present. At the point when the watch is lost time ends up noticeably repetitive. Time turns out to be nothing, similarly as Godot is nothing. This is another trial of confidence, set around Beckett. It is a test to check whether something which is absent can even now exist. Through the dramatic characters, he demonstrates to us this isn’t totally conceivable. We see that even time is simply one more idea concocted by another person. Pozzo apprehensive of timeThe play may be to be sure observed to be about the vanity about waiting for God, however one ought to rather consider it to be the vanity of waiting for God without faith since God guarantees an existence of importance and lucidness to the individuals who put their hope in him. Subsequently the anxiety, void, and silliness in the play are basically about the infertility of an existence lived without confidence, without trust in God’s guarantees of a reclaimed life, where suicide endeavors and jokes about existence uselessness follow. God guarantees to reclaim the individuals who accept and put their trust in him, so divine benevolence is basically appeared to the individuals who will accept, as the tree grows leaves in the second half, the life of conviction and confidence conquers the life of ludicrousness by bringing it trustThe play is a symbol for the purposeless nature of man’s existence. Vladimir, Estragon, Pozzo, Lucky and the boy, all represent mankind whilst Godot, it appears, represents the ethereal, the unknown. There is no meaning or purpose in what the characters say or do – it is all a futile exercise. The implication is that trying to find any meaning becomes an exercise in absurdity, best illustrated by Lucky’s garrulous, garbled diatribe in the first act. The situation in which the characters find themselves alludes to mankind’s self-indulgent nature. In order for us to support our belief in our self-importance, we need to be seen to be investing our time in finding answers and being productive, in some way or another. The play brilliantly depicts the folly of this notion, since none of the characters actually resolve any of their issues and they become victims of the march of time: they become older whilst waiting, Pozzo goes blind, Lucky becomes mute. In the end, they are stuck at exactly the point at which they were at the beginning of the play.The characters are caught in an ever-repeating cycle, forgetting the past either willingly or unwittingly, and therefore not learning from it. Their existence has a profoundly, almost ritualistic, repetitive nature about it. This further emphasises the purposelessness of life – time passes on, but we find ourselves, as far as our spiritual or intellectual evolution is concerned, right back where we started. Our supposed scientific, religious and philosophical insights and developments have lead us somewhere, but nowhere. There exists just as much meaning as there is in Lucky’s insight..